Ich halte die aktuellen Entwicklungen bezüglichlich 'Obamas' Politik für besonders wichtig, die sich in folgenden zwei Infowars-Artikeln widerspiegeln:
[Link nur für registrierte und freigeschaltete Mitglieder sichtbar. Jetzt registrieren...]
Hier habe ich die wichtigsten Stellen des Videos niedergeschrieben. Lasst euch das mal auf der Zunge zergehen:
Zitat:
(...)
Leon Panetta (US Secretary of Defense): "You know, again: Our goal would be to seek international permission. And we would come to the Congress and inform you. And determine how best to approach this, wether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress. I think those are issues we would have to discuss as we decide what to do here."
Jeff Sessions (Senator of Alabama): "Well, I'm almost breathless about that. Because what I've heard you say is: We're going to seek international approval and tell the Congress what we might do. And we might seek congressional approval. I wanna just say to you: That's a big issue. You served in the Congress. Wouldn't you agree that that would be pretty breathtaking to the average American? So would you like to clarify that?"
(...)
Jeff Sessions (Senator of Alabama): "But before we would do this, you would seek permission of the 'international authorities'?"
Leon Panetta (US Secretary of Defense): "If we're working with an international coalition - and we're working with NATO - we would want to be able to get appropiate permissions to be able to do that. That's something that - you know - all of these countries would want to have some kind of legal basis on which to act."
Jeff Sessions (Senator of Alabama): "But what legal basis are you looking for? What... What entity?"
(...)
Jeff Sessions (Senator of Alabama): "So you're saying NATO would give you a legal basis? And an ad hoc coalition of nations would provide a legal basis?"
Leon Panetta (US Secretary of Defense): "If we were able to put together a coalition and were able to move together, then obviously we would seek whatever legal basis we would need in order to make that justified. You know, you can't just pull them all together in a combat operation without getting the legal basis on which to act."
Jeff Sessions (Senator of Alabama): "Who are you asking for the legal basis from?"
Leon Panetta (US Secretary of Defense): "Well, obviously if the UN passed a security resulution as it did in Lybia, we would do that. If NATO came together as we did in Bosnia, we would rely on that. So, you know, we have options here if we want to build the kind of international approach to dealing with the situation."
Jeff Sessions (Senator of Alabama): "Well, I'm all for having international support. But I'm really baffled by the idea that somehow an international assembly provides a legal basis for United States military to be deployed in combat. I don't belief it's close to being correct. You know, they provide no legal authority. The only legal authority that is required for the United States military is the Congress and the President and the law and the Constitution."
Leon Panetta (US Secretary of Defense): "Let me - just for the record - be clear again, Senator, so there is no misunderstanding: When it comes to the national defense of this country, the President of the United States has the authority under the Constitution to act, to defend this country - and we will. If it comes to an operation where we're trying to build a coalition of nations to work together to go in, and operate as we did in Lybia or Bosnia, for that matter Afghanistan, we want to do it with permissions either by NATO or by the international comittee."
|
Nachdem es die große Nachricht war, dass Obama dem Kongress jegliche Macht abgesprochen hat und ihn als rein zeremoniell deklariert hat, da er sagte, dass ihm die UN sagt, ob er in den Krieg zu ziehen habe oder nicht - und der Kongress wäre komplett aus der Gleichung und spiele keine Rolle mehr:
[Link nur für registrierte und freigeschaltete Mitglieder sichtbar. Jetzt registrieren...] (mit Verweis auf diesen Gesetzestext: [Link nur für registrierte und freigeschaltete Mitglieder sichtbar. Jetzt registrieren...])
Zitat:
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress's exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress violates Congress's exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
|
Und das hat den Kongress dazu gebracht, Obama als Kriegsverbrecher verfolgen lassen zu wollen, wie der Gesetzesentwurf oben es vorsieht. Doch die Medien wollen es wie immer vertuschen. |
